Friday, 16 December 2016

formació16

Ens preguntem quin ús en fem de la tecnologia i per a què la incorporem a les nostres classes.
Plantegem una activitat en la que no fem ús de cap  tecnologia (A) i una altra per la qual sí que ens ajudarem de la tecnologia (B). I compararem què ens aporta i quines són les diferències entre elles.

A) Agafa una targeta de color segons el que hagis votat i seu en una taula on els companys tinguin targetes de color diferent al teu per trobar respostes a la pregunta més avall :
Verd fosc: molt present
Verd fluix: bastant present
Rosa: escassa
Vermell: absent

B)Visita la pàgina "Todaysmeet.com/formacio16" i dóna la teva opinió sobre la pregunta que es formula.

Que hi diuen els que en saben?
Entre aquells entesos que  es manifesten sobre l'ús de les noves tecnologies com a transformadores dels processos d'ensenyament i aprenentatge. 
  • Totalment a favor: Sugatra Mitra i el experiment "A hole in the wall" clica aquí
  • Els crítics: Clifford Nass sobre els efectes de multitasking al cervell i Nicholas Carr en parla en el seu llibre the Shallows
Abans de triar qualsevol tecnologia cal tenir molt clar  el Propòsit de l'activitat. Aquí aplicarem els nostres principis pedagògics (Teacher cognition).
Avaluació segons¨
  1. Model SAMR
  2. Taxonomia de BLOOM
Cal plantejar-se què volem aconseguir? (alguna de les 4 C? critical thinking, collaboration, creativty, communication) Quin és el millor mitjà per fer-ho? Alguna de les tecnologies que conéixem ens hi ajuda? En quin lloc dels  diagrames de models de SAMR i la taxonomia de Bloom anteriors es situa la nostra activitat?

Pràctica reflexiva ens porta directament a dissenyar/ implementar/ avaluar/ redissenyar

Activitats transformadores:
  1. Screencasting- Exemple de Russell Stannard
  2. Blogging- Exemple propi de Treball per projectes
TIC: alumnat i professors
Atenció selectiva: implicacions en l'aprenentage. Experiment " The monkey illusion.


  • Noves Tecnologies a l'aula - consequències en el rol del professor.

"The teacher is not a sage on stage anymore but a guide by the side"

Altres frases per reflexionar:

"Learning is a social activity" (Lev Vygotsky)


"The gloss shouldn't take away from the content"









Tuesday, 29 November 2016

Curs assessorament - Formació 16-17
Quin ús en fem de la tecnologia educativa ?
Respon aquesta enquesta, si us plau.

En les meves classes, l'ús de la tecnologia és...

molt present
bastant present
escassa
absent




Tuesday, 13 September 2016

BL- 10 golden rules

Golden Rules of Blended Learning

To recap  the main ideas we had been discussing throughout the course, we were requested to state the 10 golden rules of BL or what you might well call the 10 commandments of BL.
  1. Balance: Don't overload students. Think about what is essential and what is extra. If you put something in, then you take sth out.
  2. Aim:Think about your aims first and the technology afterwards. Take into account the affordances of each tool. Your choice will be driven by your teaching and learning principles. Sometimes they can also be grammar oriented, especially to reach a higher leve.
  3. Blend: Link what goes on in the class and the world outside.   Focus on the learner. What matters is what goes in their heads. 
  4. Bloom: Review our own classes. Check your activities against the SAMAR model. Higher thinking skills should take place in the class, lower thinking skills can be set for homework.
  5. Technology: Stick to a few technologies and learn them well, explore the possibilities and be consistent when using it. Do not try out lots of them superficially and keep changing them.
  6. Multimodal: Enlarge the modes information is delivered. The interactions that take place in a lesson should be engaging with different materials and people. Attacking an issue from different angles. richard Maryer's ideas. Care for visual, audio and kinesthetic learners.
  7. Flipping Flipping is scalable. Not everything in one go!
  8.  VLE: Choose a user-firendly VLE.  Labelling and organization are of utmost importance.
  9. SGC: Always use Student Generated Content for some kind of activity ( discussions, presentations....). Don't leave it in isolation.
  10. Screencasting: an effective way of providing enriching feedback.

Thursday, 8 September 2016

Role of NT

Today we looked at  Edmodo

This is a VLE that can be used as the central location for your teaching. It is a central material repository and it allow to create quizzes, polls, discussion, assignments to activate students'  learning. 
Its possibilies can be extended by using other tools such as quizlet, voicethread, snagIt (screencasting) and all google apps.

The role of the New Technologies in the classroom
When deciding how much technology we want to bring into our classes and which technology is most suitable we may want to look ath the SAMR model
THE SAMR model developed by Ruben Puentedura "offers a method of seeing how computer technology might impact teaching and learning".When moving from a traditional setting to a context where we include ICT it is vital to consider the affordances that traditional activities offer teachers so that we can plan and / or anticipate any changes in the setting or how the new technologies may affect the interaction in the classroom. 



Substitution: technology acts as a direct tool to substitute more traditional activites and has no functional improvement.
Augmentation: technology acts as direct tool to substitute and has some functional improvement
Modification: Techology allows for significant task redesign.
Redifinition: Technology allows for the creation of new tasks that were previouly inconceivable.

Teachers should't go techology crazy and we must be aware of the the effectiveness of using technology with students. Chose the right moment and for the right activity. 
In relation to this topic we read the article "Is technology tranforming education?"by Russell Stannard. We discussed it in little groups and summarized our ideas in a google document that was edited simultaneously by the different groups. This was an example of transformative teaching (SAMR). Using a technology to get a tangible outcome (the class' notes) . Technology takes you on a journey of discovery. Technology transforms the way you design your lessons and start seeing more and more possibilities.

However, when it comes to redesign your lessons, think about the benefits of using traditional activities, and consider the interaction and the communicative purpose of the task to blend F2F contents and online tasks. Remember you can have a look at SAMR Model or Bloom's taxonomy to let students do the lower thinking part at home and get some help from the teacher for higher order thinking tasks. This  bears much in common with the idea of Flipped Classroom.









Thursday, 25 August 2016

Technology and Multitasking

Google apps for education
This has been another "hands-on" session and we worked in pairs to design activities using two google apps.
  • google forms
  • google slides
We had a go to create our own forms and slide presentation and tested them on our classmates and afterward had discussed the possiblitites they offer for collaborative work.

This is an example of collaborative work with Beata Palinska. I was impressed about how you can work to create a presentation (similar to ppt) with someone who is physically not in the same room.
 It was nice to use the chat and come to an agreement on content, layout and work share.
A presentation on Madrid. Click here

How does technology contribute to the learning process?


Once again we can't give for granted the value of using technology in our classes. We should look at the teaching practice from a broad perspective. There seems to be lot of controversy in the use of Technology. We looked at the digital era from opposite views. For those who are totally in favout of using Technnology, teachers should let the lesson go and stop controlling students progress. According to them it is simply a question of a setting the correct task and everything else falls into place.


We watched an interesting experience carried out by Sugatra Mitra in a slum in Delhi: The hole in the wall




What Sugatra Mitra organized for the kids was a SOLESelf Organized Learning Environment. This is called minimally invasive education
Learning takes place with the correct combination of :
broadband connection + collaboration+ encouragement


How much can our brain take in at once?
Is multitasking really effective?

There seems to be a narrow relationship between using New Technologies and multitaskis
We discussed  how multitasking (or the time we spend online) may affect the way we think.
The term Neuroplasticity came up and the watched some videos with experiments that would bring some light on the topic.

Clifford Nass describes the effects of Multitasking on our brain.



Here is a recommended book on the use of ICT in the English classroom
A book on brain science and how attention will affect the way we live, work and learn.


Other interesting webs:
Hepell Stephen, a leading voice on The use of ICT in education.
Carr Nicholas, The shallows. Book review
Nass Clifford The myth of multitasking

Flipping the classroom

Flipped Classroom  
Today our lesson was devoted to Flipped Classroom.
We have discussed different aspects of this new approach to teaching. We realized that maybe some of us were already flipping without even knowing about it. It is one of those cases when practice comes before theory, or before a name has been coined.
  1. What is FC?
  2. What is the theory behind it?
  3. Challenges
  4. Technolgies we need
  5. Is FC the same as BL?
  6. Is FC relevant to ELT?
We worked in groups expressing our ideas about the different aspects on a google document and we shifted resposabilities and built onto what other groups had already expressed ading our own contributions.
We watched some videos about the principles of FC and the example of a school that had implemented it. We learnt about the reasons, the proces and the final outcome.






 


 In FC the delivery of knowledge takes place outside the class and the processing of the knowledge is in class. In a word, we are reversing the order of traditional methods. To follow the ideas expressed in Bloom's taxonomy, the critical thinking that takes place in cognitive engaging activities should be carried out in class whereas the discovery and undersanding is done at home. It allows to free more time in the classroom.
The risks of this approach is student's work overload. We may end up adding more and more. Antoher of the hurdles to implement FC might be the learning culture of our students.
The needed technologies: an LMS as central repository and location for your teaching (Edmodo, moodle, schoology, blackboard, google apps for education...) and tools to make content (snag it, camtasia).   


Personalisation and learning pace are key factors rather than Technology itself. Ar the end of the day you can flip the classroom with hard copies of materials so it is the approach about how to organize the order thinking higher order skills in the learning circle to maximize time. 
It's obvious that task types in class under a FC approach are different. They allow better checking students progress. This has obvious consequences in Assessment. Assessment can't be the same as in a more traditional setting. Missalignmet between the class and the assessment should be avoided by all means. 

Conclusions
The virtuous circle of success should always incorporate an element of reflection (Test-Teach-Test).
 Technologies are just a way to facilitate the teaching and learning process. 


To learn more about Flipped Classroom 
 
Here is an article by Russell Stannard on the topic. 
Here is a power point on the topic.

Flipped classroom Infography

Bloom's taxonomy in Blended Learning
Reflection as a a tool for teacher development.
Additional reading on the role of reflection in Teacher's development (NILE student's Dissertation).

Wednesday, 24 August 2016

Hands-on session

They say we always remember much better by experimenting and doing things by ourselves than being simply told or shown . So we have devoted it our morning session to a "hands on" practical session in which participants would sit and work on different work stations.  Each station reprenting the different technologies we had seen so far Quizlet, Grammarly, Kahoot,You tube, ThingLink, SnagIt and Catasia. Thes two last ones are ideal to record videos and a useful tool to screencast as a means to provide  feedback.
We had a go at creating activities with each of the technologies, opened our own accounts and helped each other with the most advanced features of each programme.
For more information and tutotials on the different technologies see Tools and Technologies in this blog .

This is a video I recorded of the class with my mobile phone, uploaded in Youtube channel and shared with my classmates in edmodo as an example of the multiple teaching possibilities having a YouTube account offers. You can see how hard Russell and my colleagues worked. It was all done in the blink of an eye, so next year I am going to record my students and upload them to my YouTube channel, provided they don't mind me dong it.


Friday, 19 August 2016

Blended Learning and multitasking


Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation Edited by Brian Tomlinson and Claire Whittaker
We have read and discussed in groups some chapters from the book on Blended Learning by the British Council that present several study cases.It was great to go around and share the information about 7 different chapters in a relatively short time span. ...feels like creativity is the key to make blended learning work in multiple contexts. It is just a matter of finding the right tools for your students and redefine the learning process to create a continous flow between the F2F and online or ICT components.
 To access the book click here.
Then we discussed the principles underpinning Blended learning.
  • There is no "right" mix
  • Online component deals with theory whereas F2F deals with practice = flipped classroom (Examples Delta and Celta certificates)
  • Higher scores
  • Higher drop outs (example MOOCS from MIT and BC, Future learn
  • Better Retention
  • Balance between Technical and content demand (cognitively difficult) ( handholding students)
  • Course needs revisiting (practice-reflect-redesign)
  • Teacher's supervision and promptness at replying. 
  • Risk: too many aims, too much technology (because of the speed tech. develops). No adding but replacing. (A good rule of thumb:you put sth in then get sth out)
MULTITASKING

The Monkey Business Illusion by Daniel Simons about selective attention task.

For more on this topic visit this site

Implications  that selective attention may have on teaching and learning. It makes you wonder how shallow our learning is. Deep thinking doesn't take place when multitasking, then we need attacking issues from different angles. If the video was viewed as a collaborative  activity some in the group would have seen it.


  • students focus down on one specific aspect
  • objectives may need to be attacked from different angles
  • collaborative work helps widen focus (tidy student working with the crazy artistic type)
Multitaskers are easily distracted. 

On this topic there is an interesting book "The Shallows" by Nicholas Carr. Listen to the writer.
.



Integrating Technology and traditonal teaching

The morning started by discussing listening activites in EFLand how to integrate those more traditional classroom activities and those that are technology driven.

We put this into practice ourselves with a listening on some research about the "Benefits of Reading". Reading a book for just 3.5 hours a week could help you live longer.

(Funnily enough I  read the story on the net not long ago, it was an article from The Independent that has gone viral in facebook on this topic: how reading contributes to longevity.)

After listening to the research the students get together and compare notes. After that there are several possibilities to create activities technology driven: text jumble, sentence building, jumbled sentences, gap filling
"Listen a minute" is a site with examples of these type of activities.
The pros of the activity: reasons for listening and taking notes, and after that good way of recycling vocabulary and structures.
Possible follow up tasks: Students get together and are requested


  • to design a class survey
  • to create a storyboard about the books they have just read (WallWisher)
  • to recommend a book they have just read (
  • to write a book review
  • to find some research on internet and present statistics
Breaking News English another interesting website .

Dictogloss: a type of activity that glamorizes dictation. The teacher reads a story once while students take notes, teacher reads the text again, students take more notes and compare in pairs, then in little groups have to rewrite the whole text. Finally they compare with the original.

Here is a good story I found in the British Council to be used for this kind of activity. It is a listening activity with a vocabulary purpose as it focuses on learning some collocations that upper-intermediate students are expected to learn.


I met my ex-husband in 1995; we fell in love at first sight. We had a fantastic relationship for three happy years. Then, on our third anniversary, he proposed and we got married six months later. At first, everything was perfect; we both did the housework together; I did the washing-up and made the beds and he did the cooking and the shopping. He always made a mess when he did the cooking, but I didn’t mind because the dinners were always delicious.
Everything changed after a few years when he got a new job in Manchester; we made the decision to move there, so he wouldn’t have to take the train to work every day. He started working later and paying less attention to me. He stopped doing the housework, so I had to do everything. He made a lot of promises but then he would break them. He was very stressed and he started to go bald, he got very depressed about this and started getting drunk after work. I was getting very worried about him. He would always come home drunk and make a mess. Then, one day, while I was cleaning his clothes, something caught my attention. It was a lipstick stain on his shirt. I got very angry; he was keeping a secret from me! That night when he came home, I confronted him and he broke the news to me: he had been having an affair. It broke my heart. I kicked him out of the house and we got divorced two weeks later.

Text with gaps:
I met my ex-husband in 1995; we ____ in love at first sight. We ___ a fantastic relationship for three happy years. Then, on our third anniversary, he proposed and we ___ married six months later. At first, everything was perfect; we both ___ the housework together; I ___ the washing-up and ____ the beds and he ___ the cooking and the _______. He always ____ a mess when he ___ the cooking, but I didn’t mind because the dinners were always delicious.
Everything changed after a few years when he ___ a new job in Manchester; we ____ the decision to move there, so he wouldn’t have to ____ the train to work every day. He started working later and ______ less attention to me. He stopped _____ the housework, so I had to __ everything. He ____ a lot of ______ but then he would _____ them. He was very stressed and he started to ___ bald, he ___ very depressed about this and started ______ drunk after work. I was ______ very worried about him. He would always come home drunk and ____ a mess. Then, one day, while I was cleaning his clothes, something ______ my attention. It was a lipstick stain on his shirt. I ___ very angry; he was _____ a secret from me! That night when he ____ home, I confronted him and he _____ the news to me: he had been ______ an affair. It _____ my heart. I kicked him out of the house and we ___ divorced two weeks later.

Lecture Programme

Today is Wednesday so this is a much shorter session as  in the evening there is a talk by a guest speaker. Today, Jeremy Harmer  on coursebooks "Back between covers". Watch the talk at Nile online library.





Thursday, 18 August 2016

Giving feedback

Language learning
Key Ingredients to guarantee effective language learning.
  • motivation (goal), 
  • determination
  • exposure, 
  • use (pick any bit of E. that comes your way)
  • aptitude (some people seem to have a natural propensity and make better learners)
  • meaningful communication
  • Reading (essential at certain levels to process the language and bring your level further up)
Best example: Russell's method of learning French: lots of listening to podcasts, reading, watching news in F. grammar as it is needed. Result: very competent in speaking despite lower grammar level. It does come a point when grammar is important.

Teachers should have their own principles and truly believe in how a language is learnt. This is known as teacher cognition (Simon Borg)
I'm really pleased because I see eye to eye with Russell that meaningful content is more effective than grammar. Again, Technology is only a tool to reach our objectives. Russell started using technology in 1995 but he  was already doing a lot of group work and pair work.

Screencasting, an effective way o providing feedback


Russell Stannard presents the three most popular technologies from his very popular and user-friendly website www.teachertrainingvideos.com.  



Russell Stannard presenting 10 ways to use screencasting

Russell Stannard with an Introduction to SnagIt.

The fact of recording whatever you do and can see on a computer plus your voice commenting on what's going on.
This is revolutionary teaching idea that has multiple uses: to deliver content (teacher) and also to process it (student)
The main use is that it can be used to give students feedback on their written and aural work. techer can provide the marking scheme/ assessing criteria before actually correcting whatever the students produce.

Advantages:
  • Rich content (much more information is coveyed, we speak 4 to 7 times faster than we write)
  • Formative
  • Personal (one-to-one teaching)
  • Focused,(much clearer explanations for the student)
  • Good listening practice of natural language
  • Dual coding: using visual and audio elements at the same time enhances working memory (Richard Mayer)
  • Allows reviewing.
An example of good use of screencasting: as students' reflective exercise. Russell's experiment: He set an assigment for his students to do, he got it backto be corrected, gave each student a mark without letting them know. Then he wrote a checklist of what he expected to read in those essays and recorded it. He sent it back to his students and asked them to score their production. Most of them scored their mark lower than he as a teacher had.

Possible problems:

  • Time consuming for the teacher, but does everything need to be corrected?
  • Consistency We should agree on format or length, very brief or very detailed?
  • Not good for second markers
  • Privacy 
  • It's not dialogic
  • Works betten on longer pieces of work
  • Big groups. Send them a recording of the rubric (scoring guide used to evaluate the quality of students' constructed responses).
Conclusion:
It's a very efective way of providing feedback. It adds value to yoour course. It's the next best thing after having a F2F session with the student. 

Learn more about giving feedback

Watch a power point on how technology can contribute to feedback reflection.
An article on feedback methods used at school.


Technologies used to provide feedback: SangIt and Camtasia SnagIt
One of the technologies to screencast.
Possible uses other than providing feedback:
  • Delivering grammar
  • Pronunciation exercises
  • Make up lessons

Ideal for mixed-ability classes. Also to help C1 students at the EOI with their presentations.